Winchester 244 powder reloading data No Further a Mystery

Winchester 244 powder reloading data No Further a Mystery

Blog Article

So essentially the middle from the load performs in the 45 as I’ve located in another calibers. Might be the angle but your crimson marked situation looks like the lighter load to me. But possibly one particular appears to be like terrific.

No Qualified techs seem to have experimented with it. You can find small threat in about to lighter payloads right until you start obtaining weak and even squibby, or You cannot get yourself a wad that fills up the stack.

I understand no one might be planning to want to reply that in print And that i would've questioned Hodgdon instantly, but I work with adequate Lawyers to really know what their answer will be.

When you buy by one-way links on our web-site, we may generate an affiliate commission, which supports our community.

I've just started loading Gain 244 in 9mm and to this point it appears to be like particularly promising. It's a quick powder with cost weights somewhere amongst Titegroup and Earn 231, a minimum of in 9mm.

Insert to quotation Only show this user #2 · Jan 9, 2022 Problem with get powder, Is in regards to the time most think of a favorite load for the ability/it gains a pursuing, Earn will discontinue the ability and come up with something else. Feel 452AA back again while in the working day that experienced a big following.

When pressures fall to 10k psi or considerably less, the entire length of the case can get sooty when fired, which suggests a poor seal. As brass operate hardens (nearly four times fired) it will take more strain to get a good chamber seal. 15k psi chamber strain will nonetheless make brass develop to secure a very good seal It doesn't matter how persistently the brass has become fired. With all Having said that, when chamber pressures drops down below 15k psi, you will not get a very good powder burn off and you may not get a superb chamber seal …. the two causing sooty scenarios and anything a get more info lot less than stellar efficiency.

This is certainly an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Make sure you take into consideration developing a new thread.

Incorporate to quote Only display this person #eleven · Nov 11, 2018 243winxb, Indeed, brass growth is another reason for larger chamber pressures however it is surely not the key motive …. It can be powder burn up. The numbers you utilized genuinely do not have much to perform with brass increasing to seal in a chamber …. they've got more to perform with stretching the duration. Straight wall brass cases …. even magnum conditions hardly ever stretch in duration when fired and reloaded ten moments or even more. Annealed (gentle) brass circumstances will grow to seal in a chamber with about ten~12k psi chamber stress.

I assume that what I used to be seeking to figure out is if the published starting off velocities for these new powders was established as a result of a Actual physical limitation on the powder or if it absolutely was established by an attorney.

Alright, so it is not a load that you simply shot over the lure variety, Regardless that you seem to possess a classic lure gun that you'll be shooting it by way of, and you shot a round of 25 straight as a result of that single barrel. How would we ever doubt that?

My two cents might be no... We now have a lot of powders suitable for Bullseye pistol. What could well be attained apart from data that might not be well worth much?

The 244 powder naturally has a slower burn off charge. There are not several powders considerably quicker than TG. Sorry for throwing that in the best way I did. Gotcha, many thanks.

380 masses about 100fps more rapidly. I didn’t know 244 even existed! Many thanks beforehand. I've quite a bit of TG, but will need a lot more powder Inside the following month or so.

Have you been chronographing your masses or checking out a e book that is applying an extended barrel than you've got for data. Its fundamentally a brand new improved 231, also I'm guaranteed more cost-effective . Can take up significantly less space than 231, IRRC almost certainly about the same as tightgroup.